Tír Na HiFi

Listened to a playlist of three (short) files, and the whole list played fine.
When finished, cpu usage quickly rise to c.25%, and after a few seconds was some noise. Close mqnplay, and no problem.
Big thanks to sbgk for this!!
For sq compared to v93, more listening.
Cheers

Listened to v88, v93 and v95. v88 has less detail. The other two - I think I like v93 best - amazing as elaprince say. They both have very good detail. Another thing: A week ago I installed Windows 10 Home on my music PC. With MQn I used mqnplay win 10 v88, control v28 and loader v27. When I started...

elaprince wrote:Yes
+1 for v88

Listened to v75 and v88. I much prefer v88.

sbgk wrote: yup, v75 seems to be a freak of nature, really gets a grip of the music, on with the control update then.

+1

Listened to v73, 74 and 75.
v74 has a slight veil.
Both the other two are fine. (I think) I prefer v73, it make the music sing, like Aleg I "love it".
The lack of treble in v73 - my old ears do not register that much.

Listened to play v65/loader v25 and play v69/loader v27.
v69 is clearly better.
v69 has more clearity and a fine way of presenting the music. Very nice listening.

elaprince wrote:I prefer v65 Gordon
v66 and v67 seems more "congested" in my setup
Thanks

I also prefer v65 to v66.
v66 has some noise/haze, v65 no such thing.

Aleg wrote: Looking forward to a multi-track loader now

+1

TioFrancotirdor wrote: v65 is absolutely fenomenal! Thanks Gordon.

+1

Have been working at applying the v54 changes to other areas of mqnplay and think it has made quite a dramatic improvement in articulation, the best I've heard, so taking it up another level. V54 was a change to one area, there were another 4 areas impacted. Shall try and optimise it further and ge...