Tír Na HiFi

Hi Gordon. We had listening session yeastarday. For us differences between 8.92 v15 avx2 and 8.92 are easily noticable. In our system v15 is more "tight", more dynamic and rythm. For me sound is "heavier" also.
Eventually we and up listening with v15 and like it better.

To make life easier type:
mqndevinfo.exe >> SomeFileName.txt
in command line.
Your device identifier will be saved to SomeFileName.txt, so then you will be able to open it and copy/paste it here.

Here is what I have found out on no sound from the dev version: if I play it after starting the PC, then I get no sound; if I play some other version and then the dev version, it plays ok. In my system, the dev version SQ is more detailed and less harsh (quite rare!). the pin is supposed to go to a...

KUH wrote:...Hirez is also a good idea for a Christmas gift...

+1 :)

Thanks Gordon. 3.74/8.92 (fixed device name) rocks! It is more clearer and transparent than auto one to me. My girlfriend is my blind tester. I never tell whether I changed something or not. I just play they music as usual an see if there is any reaction or not. She has musical education. This time,...

Thanks. However no sound :(

avx2 please.

\\?\tusbaudio_enum#vid_20b1&pid_2009&ks#6&2d0774d9&0&9#{6994ad04-93ef-11d0-a3cc-00a0c9223196}\pcm_out_02_00
0

@Fujak

I like your description over sound quality. I experienced and observed the similar. If everything is "good" then in long term listing I found my self wanting listening more and wanting to turn the volume up, whereas when something is "wrong" I tend to do otherwise.

I agree. 3.72/8.91 avx2 is the best KS so far. Untill this one I used 5.14 avx2 Waspi. Now it is hard to say which one I like more ...