Page 795 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:30 pm
by janh
I listened a bit to 260/103/48, 261/104/49 and 262/105/50
260: Less detail,
261: More detail, like it better,
but
262: Best detail, transparency and beauty of tone. This is really good.

Thank you again, Gordon

Jan H

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:16 pm
by sbgk
janh wrote:I listened a bit to 260/103/48, 261/104/49 and 262/105/50
260: Less detail,
261: More detail, like it better,
but
262: Best detail, transparency and beauty of tone. This is really good.

Thank you again, Gordon

Jan H
Yes, agree about 262. Think I'm getting enough of the violinist breathing and scratches of the bow etc, don't need any more detail.
Did you use rewrite ?

Stellar feedback continues for the F-1 on headfi, a really interesting beast. Shall postpone any further MQn development until I hear if it's player agnostic.

MQn would still be useful for portable high quality music using laptop, usb dac and headphones.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:02 am
by janh
sbgk wrote: Did you use rewrite ?
Yes, 2x rewrite on mqnrewrite.exe and all .exe files in Mqnrewrite an Musicplayer- folders. Also 2x rewrite on music files used for listening. When comparing versions, a new rewrite for each version.

Rewrite means a lot, the music is more present.

Cheers

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:26 pm
by sebna
262 slightly on the bright side in my system

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:53 pm
by minionas
262/105/50 is damn good. I dont feel it as brighter, just more revealing and airy

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:31 pm
by sbgk
minionas wrote:262/105/50 is damn good. I dont feel it as brighter, just more revealing and airy
my ears have gone funny, so can't reliably comment. At the time of development it sounded ok, now it might be on the bright side.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:36 pm
by minionas
I dont feel it bright on my diy sabre dac..
Definition and air... love it!

Re: MQN

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 7:53 pm
by sbgk
Initial view of the Singxer F-1 xmos xu208, phenomenal and it will only get better. Wow, a new era indeed.

Just did a comparison between playpcmwin wasapi player and mqn and there is still a difference, so not player agnostic yet.

Re: MQN

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:14 pm
by sima66
sbgk wrote:Initial view of the Singxer F-1 xmos xu208, phenomenal and it will only get better. Wow, a new era indeed.
So, can you still hear the differences between different players?

Re: MQN

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:23 pm
by sbgk
sima66 wrote:
sbgk wrote:Initial view of the Singxer F-1 xmos xu208, phenomenal and it will only get better. Wow, a new era indeed.
So, can you still hear the differences between different players?
Just did a comparison between playpcmwin wasapi player (which I think is pretty aggressive sounding) and mqn and there is still a difference, so not player agnostic yet.

But what a sound, best I've heard, turn your £400 dac into a £10000 dac.

Buy this or wait for the super Regen or JK secret squirrel project.

What will it the sq be like in 5 years time ? Interesting times.